Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some people thinks that accepting bad situations is the best way, while others have opinion that trying and improving bad situations are better. I partly agree with both opinions, since each view has its own great sides.

When facing bad situations such as getting an uncomfortable job and lacking of money, we have to accept it. This means that we should think positively about those situations. For the example, we have to try thinking like this "if I didn't work here, i would not learn to adapt with work environment like this". And also, "Although the job is unsatisfactory, but the wages are high enough to fulfill my daily needs". So, i have opinion that every bad situations has beneficial thing that can be absorbed for the development of ourselves, and that God has good intention and great plan for us behind those obstacles.

Besides that, accepting and thinking positively are not enough for us. Because, by only accepting and not introspecting ourselves, we would not try to increase our abilities. For the example, by only surrendering to the situation where our jobs are dissatisfying, we won't try to improve our skills that will enable us to get out from those situations. But, if we attempt to add more skills and abilities that needed by the new workplace, we will finally be able to get a better job.

So, in conclusion, although people may have different opinions, I concur that I only partly agree to both opinions. Because, each of those perspectives has the good thing that can be learnt to establish a better us.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ve to try thinking like this 'if I didnt work here, i would not learn to adapt w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...g like this 'if I didnt work here, i would not learn to adapt with work envi...
^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t I only partly agree to both opinions. Because, each of those perspectives has the goo...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 5.60731707317 767% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90943396226 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85175181775 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550943396226 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 1.07073170732 654% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0740480655 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.076923077 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206488360877 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757258829443 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775364898281 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137528926608 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091010461888 0.0819641961636 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.