Some people claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled.
They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is often argued that the government should enhance the laws about recycling in order to protect the environment while the others hold that increasing laws would not be enough to raise awareness for the green environment. I completely disagree with this point because the government needs to bring some recycling cognizance to people before laws.
Some people simplistically claim that recycling is insufficient and just solve this problem to be enacted the new codes. In other words, if the government increased strict laws about it, citizens would be more careful. For example, when somebody does not be interested in recycling, he or she has to pay more taxes or to be fined by the government. However, there is little evidence to support this view that increasing laws can solve this problem totally when people do not make this willingly because they have to do because of laws. Indeed, they will not pay attention to protect the environment.
On the other hand, there is a view that firstly government should increase awareness to maintain a green environment. The proponents of this view reasonably argue that some advertising which is related to the importance of recycling can be published for individuals. For instance, they can show our nature how can be demolished because of some harmful products for the environment and because of that many animals such as fish could die. Maybe after 10 years, there will not be any fish in the sea. Besides, the government ought to give some education to children and adults to keep clean and recycle their garbages. All of them can be more useful and permanent rather than putting new codes.
To sum up, although some people assume that increasing laws is essential to raise more recycling, the other view fairly concludes that it is not a realistic and permanent solution and first people should really want it. Also, governments should support them with some advertising and educational activities. Personally, I believe that punishments cannot improve our awareness about recycling and we already have to know the results and want to protect our habitat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...ul. For example, when somebody does not interested in recycling, he or she has to pay more...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ermanent rather than putting new codes. To sum up, although some people assume t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'it is'.
Suggestion: it is
...g, the other view fairly concludes that it is it is not a realistic and permanent solution ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 1.00243902439 1496% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 5.60731707317 624% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 965.302439024 183% => OK
No of words: 349.0 196.424390244 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07163323782 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73607613079 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 106.607317073 164% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501432664756 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 283.868780488 193% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2899187842 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254813246141 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840671547042 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514065089354 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170487410345 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392528734494 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.