Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.
In the global warming period, it is argued that an ecological crisis should be given in the top priority while some contend that other environmental problems are most important. Although both of them impact on each other, I completely agree that many environmental issues need to be solved before the loss of species.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why we consider the survival of species. This change causes a domino effect on the fragile ecosystems because there is a strong symbiosis between plants and animals. The extinction of one species can lead to a lack of food resources for other species. Taking the predator is lion as an example, what would happen if one day they struggle with their primary food such as deers, antelopes disappear, they will scramble other animals for living or even endanger on the secure of people living nearby. The whole underground and underwater ecosystem can face a catastrophic disruption if the authorities don’t have strict measures to prevent.
On the other hand, we can intervene in the extinction of biodiversity by taking action on other environmental issues. Firstly, global warming leading to forest fires or melting glaciers in many regions, which cause the death of animal and plant species and the destruction of natural habitat. For instance, the biggest tropical forest is Amazon, which has reached record-breaking over 80000 forest fires recently. Secondly, many rivers and oceans were polluted by releasing fossil fuels and forms of plastic over the years; this could lead to high sea level and depletes marine animals as well, a typical is blue whales which are on the brink of extinction.
In conclusion, protecting the survival of animals and plants species is protecting our humanity. However, I still agree that other environmental problems should be high on the agenda
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Phạm Phú Trường | 73 | view |
- : Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main resources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think it is positive or negative developement. 89
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old house in the local areas, while other think that people should have freedom to build house of their own styles. discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...el and depletes marine animals as well, a typical is blue whales which are on the brink o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 303.0 196.424390244 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13531353135 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7567022809 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 106.607317073 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 283.868780488 171% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.644503863 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188627174182 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661294683081 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551462275733 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125414327165 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572005650422 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 40.7170731707 221% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.