Some people say that online learning can replace traditional schools. What is your opinion?
Write an argumentative essay with refutation (about 250 words)
It is true that many people agree with the idea that pupils nowadays should learn in digital schools. However, while it could be argued that learning online is valuable in some cases, I believe that such a policy should not replace traditional schools. Therefore, this essay will look cautiously at both views and explain the reason behind my opinion
One the one hand, it is advantageous for children to study online in some special occasions. One reason is that it could be able to help students develop their behavioral and social skills through interaction with their teacher or classmate at distance learning. In this way, for some students who are still shy at communication, they now can confidently talk to the teacher through the screen of electronic devices. Another reason is that if teachers can control the student’s learning situations, it will be easier to create learning plans that are suitable for individual pupils and help them keep up with their studies to get better results.
On the other hand, I would agree that traditional schools could bring more benefit for learners. To be more specific, physical contact with teachers can help pupils apply directly from lectures to assignments and also broaden horizon of knowledge for individual students. In additional, the school curriculum will help students to have a chance to improved social skills. They will be able to Improved communication skills, connecting with more friends and it is also a good environment for students to become a team-players. For example, like me right now, because of COVID -19 epidemic, my school has organized an online course for each student could available learning at home. With personal experience, I see that it’s not a good way to study in long terms. Lack of communication and physical contact makes me loss of interest and disrupt lesson.
In conclusion, it is clear to me that it would be better for children to attend traditional schools rather than digital school. By maintaining the traditional way of learning, it’s will help students get the best education program
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in some cases, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 1.00243902439 1596% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 5.60731707317 642% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 965.302439024 181% => OK
No of words: 343.0 196.424390244 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10204081633 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7547333426 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 106.607317073 174% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539358600583 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 283.868780488 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 1.53170731707 783% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5908109509 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179811600177 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634211035584 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390232372294 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119541433414 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407882141827 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 40.7170731707 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.