Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people said that studying from home through technology gadgets is not as beneficial as gaining knowledge with friends at school. This following essay shows an agreement with this. From my perspective, your mood would go up by this method. Secondly, the studying quality also ries.
Studying with a group of students would influence yourself in a positive way. You would be in a very good mood because you are learning with people you may feel familiar, you can ask any exercise that you do not understand clearly. When your group has a break, everyone can easily talk to each other. Moreover, because of the low gap in age, everyone may have the same interest. This would bring comfort and keep you awake all the time because you are not studying alone.
In addition, the studying process with other students in the classroom is more efficient than one online. It has proved that you may feel more excited when you follow this way of learning. Therefore the lesson can be conveyed better, help you do the exercises wiser. Furthermore, after school, the teamates may gather in one room and trade notes that are written down in classes. When you revise for the final exam, for instance, these notes would be a big help. Students cannot use them to cheat, they are just the teachers' lectures.
To sum up, either learning online or offline, these ways of studying all lead to good achievements at the end. Each person has to try both to find out which you are suitable for, so that you can be passionate on this job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...up of students would influence yourself in a positive way. You would be in a very good mood becau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d when you follow this way of learning. Therefore the lesson can be conveyed better, hel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay of learning. Therefore the lesson can be conveyed better, help you do the exer...
^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which you are suitable for, so that you can be passionate on this job.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 1.00243902439 1397% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 5.60731707317 589% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67537313433 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36163964982 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 106.607317073 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4905132028 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.7058823529 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302480798541 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886305519087 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750898286912 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168590041439 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328524391115 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.