Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featrures and make comparisions wher relevant

Essay topics:

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featrures, and make comparisions wher relevant

The given line graph illustrate the figure for coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five cities namely Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart in last 4 weeks
Overall, the percentage of people who bought fresh coffee was lowest in the whole period while the opposite was true for those who went to a cafe for coffee or tea in the last 4 weeks. In Addition, the number from revenue from instant coffee was in the middle range
According to the graph, city residents in Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne and Hobart prefer to go to cafes than buy fresh and instant coffee. The proportion of citizens went to cafes in Melbourne, Hobart and Sydney were nearly equal with the data 64 percent, 63 percent and 61 percent respectively
Although the rates of instant coffee was consumed in Adelaide is higher than went to cafe and bought fresh coffee but Adelaide’s resident seem like both instant coffee and went to coffee because the percentage of instant coffee was 50 percent while that of went to cafe just less than 1 percent

Votes
Average: 2.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-12 Nguyễn Dung 21 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uying and drinking habits in five cities namely Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adel...
^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart in last 4 weeks Overall, the percentage...
^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fes in Melbourne, Hobart and Sydney were nearly equal with the data 64 percent, 6...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78333333333 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36258777353 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 60.0 22.4926829268 267% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.7482414425 43.030603864 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 287.0 112.824112599 254% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 60.0 22.9334400587 262% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.1 13.2329268293 235% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 27.5 61.2550243902 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.3 10.3012195122 236% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 25.5 11.4329268293 223% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 26.0 10.9970731707 236% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.