The bar chart represents the consumption of water in US, Canada, Italy, France and Germany and the table gives data on how much money that residents pay for 1 cubic meter of water in these 5 countries shown.
Overall, the amount of water used in US families is the highest. In contrast, the cost of water in this country is the lowest.
In the bar chart, the quantity of liters of water manipulated in Germany is the lowest, which stands at around 210 liters. Above that number, the amount of water used in France is about 40 liters higher than that used in Germany, whereas the utilization of water in France and Italy ranks 2nd and 3rd respectively. The amount of water consumed in the United States is the largest with a total number of about 310 liters.
As can be seen in the table, the cost for 1 cubic meter of water in France is the highest ($2.1 per cubic meter), while the cost of water per a cubic meter in the US is the cheapest, with only 1/210 of the figure for that in France. Water cost in Germany is rather high ($1.35 per cubic meter), which ranks the second in the comparison of the five countries. In Italy and Canada, people pay a bit lower for water consumption with $0.7 and $0.31 per cubic respectively
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay tax to the state To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include 84
- The line graph below shows the monthly ridership of four separate transportation forms in a European metropolitan area between 1980 and 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant Write at 73
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hile the cost of water per a cubic meter in the US is the cheapest, with only 1/2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40350877193 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28713667105 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464912280702 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4084348773 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263889039662 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127142106246 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655068432887 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188711431253 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607349536047 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.