The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives some information about the police budget in three distinct groups, while the pie chart illustrates the percentage of distribution in three main different subjects for 2017 and 2018 in one area of the United Kingdom.
It is obvious that the National Government had the maximum budget among these groups 177.8m in 2018, with 69 percent of the whole budget used for officers and staff salaries.
As can be seen, the total budget of about 14 percent was raised in 2018 and the most increase related to Local Texas by approximately 11 percent in one of the areas of the United Kingdom. The other two groups did not increase significantly. The government decided to decrease 4 percent of the salary of staff and officers in 2018 and allocate this budget to the technology group. The percentage of money spent on buildings and transport doesn’t change in these two years.
As a result, by increasing the budget in 2018 and reducing staff’s salary the government has decided to pay attention to developing the technology by spending more money on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show a harbor in 2000 and how it looks today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...te this budget to the technology group. The percentage of money spent on buildings ...
^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port doesn’t change in these two years. As a result, by increasing the budget in...
^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...echnology by spending more money on it.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90055248619 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69669860919 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4240504518 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221748450032 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897642260137 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100780001277 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137725520493 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109704124685 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.