The pie chart compares the percentage of people residing in Australia who come from different countries. Meanwhile, the table illustrates the proportion of the population living in different areas.
It is immediately apparent that Australian people account for most of Australia's population, and living in the city is the most popular choice by people in Australia.
Looking at the pie chart, Australian people account for nearly three-quarters of Australia’s population, at 73%. The percentages of people from the UK and New Zealand are much lower, at 7% and 3%, respectively. The figures for people from China and Dutch are lowest, at 2% and 1%. The other nationality accounts for 14%.
Looking at the table, it is clear that living in the city is the most popular choice for Chinese people, 99% of people choosing, whereas only 1% lived in the countryside. A similar picture is evident in the figures for people from Australia, Dutch, the UK, and New Zealand, with their urban population amounting to a high of 80 - 90%.
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 89
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011 67
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 71
- The table below shows the average weekly salaries of men and od women working in different occupations Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ina and Dutch are lowest, at 2% and 1%. The other nationality accounts for 14%. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08235294118 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94684623611 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1380213836 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153681205545 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790277608939 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719947769334 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118488072519 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947930367755 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.