The maps depict information about modifications to the ground floor of a university department in 2000 and 2015.
In general, there were significant changes in the layout of the ground floor of the university department over the period shown, with various facilities being built.
In 2000, there was a small main gate which directly led to the building. Only three seminar rooms in the university department and a corridor separated them, with two spaces being on the left and one place being on the right of the hallway. There was a library which was between the third seminar room and the office room. Moreover, the university authorities had constructed a park on the right corner of the map.
In 2005, the size of the office room was extended, which covered the original library. The number of seminar rooms increased to five rooms, with three places being on the west of the map, and two rooms being on the opposite side. The IT Center and the library replaced the original park, and there was a small corridor separated them. Besides, a parking lot was erected near the main entry.
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 70
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 71
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011 67
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'The' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: The; IT
...d two rooms being on the opposite side. The IT Center and the library replaced the ori...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84574468085 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50230201846 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7729520164 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215211940206 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969703858897 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141517941289 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205231018798 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169629598766 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.