The table shows the number of students who did research in Australian universities, and the pie charts compare the proportion of these students by gender. The figures were given for 2001 and 2010.
Overall, the number of Australian research students increased significantly over the given period. Besides, the figure for local students is always higher than that for international ones.
In 2001, the majority of students researching in Australia were local (33,657) compared to only 5,192 students from outside the country. By 2010, the number of local students had risen to nearly 40,000, and international research students had also witnessed a nearly three-fold increase in its population, to 54,081 to be specific.
Regarding gender distribution, in 2001, the proportion of local male students was equal to that of females, at 43% for each, while there was a disparity in gender among students from other countries, with the figure for females (9%) being more than twice as high as that for males (4%). Over the following ten years, female local students outnumbered their male counterparts, with the percentage of the former being 4% higher. However, in the international group, the figure for females was slightly lower than that for males.
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family. What are the reasons, and effects of this? 56
- The table and pie chart shows the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- A few language are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or negative development? 56
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('nearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('three-fold') instead of another adjective.
...al research students had also witnessed a nearly three-fold increase in its population, to 54,081 t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s population, to 54,081 to be specific. Regarding gender distribution, in 2001, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2864321608 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81312798291 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.878676368 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177969750021 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919863317282 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775197485535 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145479312249 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088792104569 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.