The table and pie chart shows the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The pie charts compare the percentage of local research student and international research student in gender in australian universities in the year 2001 and 2010.
Overall, the total number of student in australian universities increased from 2001 to 2010. In addition, the percentage of local student were by far higher than that of international student in both 2 years.
From 2001 to 2010, there was a growth of nearly 10000 abroad students. Only 13% of international student in 2001 in which the proportion of male student over doubled those for female student, 9% compared to 4%. The figure for abroad research student increased to 27% in 2010 with 12% of male student and 15% of female student
local research student accounted for 87% in total student in Austalian universities in 2001 then it dropped to 73% in 2010. female and male local student held the same proportion, at 43% in 2001. these figures decreased significantly, 35% of female local student compared to 39% of male local student.
- The pie charts below show the avarage household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 61
- The table and pie chart shows the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 67
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, some certain jobs suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- The bar charts illustrate the alterations and differences in the average percentages of sodium, saturated fats and added sugars in typical meals consumed in the USA. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsities in the year 2001 and 2010. Overall, the total number of student in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnational student in both 2 years. From 2001 to 2010, there was a growth of...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... student and 15% of female student local research student accounted for 87%...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Local
...t and 15% of female student local research student accounted for 87% in t...
^^^^^
Line 25, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Female
...in 2001 then it dropped to 73% in 2010. female and male local student held the same pr...
^^^^^^
Line 25, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ld the same proportion, at 43% in 2001. these figures decreased significantly, 35% of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20359281437 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83474597063 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497005988024 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5855196971 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240287480201 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138151472938 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857687817966 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194711533117 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613563059611 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.