The table below given information about students enrolments at Manchester university in 1937 and 1967 ,2017 .summarize the information selecting main features and relevant and comparisons .

Essay topics:

The table below given information about students enrolments at Manchester university in 1937 and 1967 ,2017 .summarize the information selecting main features and relevant and comparisons .

The given chart compares the proportion of boys and girls enrolments at Manchester university during the time period 1937,1967and 2017.

Overall, the total percentage of candidates in 2017 year was higher than period. In all the years the students enrolling proportion of most by males and females as well as locals.

In the year 2017, the total proportion of students is highest, at 6254 compared with 327 and 1133 for new children in the year 1937 and 1967 respectively. The percentage of females account for 55 of the total students in the year 2017 while the percentage was lower for 1937 and 3 decades, at 45% and, at only 35% respectively. However, in terms of local students that largest percentage in 1937, accounting for 55%. The figures for year 2017 and 1967are only 15% and 2% respectively. Moreover, students were enrolling at university from abroad which has the largest percentage at 32% in 2017 as compared to 6% in year 1937 and 7% of 1967 respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by user amandeep kaur … :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... candidates in 2017 year was higher than period. In all the years the students en...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2017 while the percentage was lower for 1937 and 3 decades, at 45% and, at only ...
^^
Line 5, column 560, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at university from abroad which has the largest percentage at 32% in 2017 as com...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90963855422 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85240168699 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2587569849 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223284938432 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116797905221 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740068107002 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164509889436 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066594839829 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.