The below chart illustrates shifts in some types of travel used by per capita in England from 1985 to 2000.
It is apparent that while walking, bicycle, and local bus had a downward trend, the opposite was true in car, long distance bus, train, taxi, and others. In addition, the total number of tourists increased and the figure for the car was dominant throughout this period.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1985, the average distance traveled by an Engish in a car was 3,199 miles, then grew to 4806 miles in 2000. Besides, although the commuters in 2000 used taxis more threefold than those in 1985, this type accounted for a mere 42 miles. There was a dramatic increase in train and other, with 366 miles and 585 miles respectively.
According to the table, the figure for walking fell slightly from 255 miles to 237 miles. In terms of bicycles, the year 1985 witnessed 51 miles used by a person and later decreased to the same level as a taxi in 2000. Finally, there was a significant decline in the local bus, from 429 miles to 274 miles.
- New technologies and ways of buying and selling are transforming the lives of consumer To what extent do you agree of disagree with this opinion 87
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 84
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56842105263 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37225420807 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9513710287 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822702807586 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382955588824 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519091929055 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651356027913 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603325089136 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.