The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The table illustrates the changes in average distances in miles covered by person per years in eight different transportation tools, and this survey was conducted in the UK between 1985 and 2000.
To begin with, the distance traveled by car had by far the most in all modes, increasing from 3199 miles to 4806 miles between 1985 and 2000. Other transportation tools saw a similar trend as the train. The former climbed from 450 to 585 miles, and the latter increased from 289 to 366 miles.
Turning to the figure for walking and bicycle. There was a small decline recorded by bicycle from 1985 to 2000 when the number slight dropped from 51 to 41 miles, and this mode became the least popular one. Walking saw a marginal decrease from 255 to 237 miles between 1985 and 2000. The most significant decline was depicted in the local bus, with the number reducing from 429 miles to 274 miles.
Overall, the car was the favorite mode in all types, followed by others. The distance traveled by most of the transportation tools saw a moderate increase, except for walking, bicycle, and local bus.
- News media has become more influential in people’s lives. Other believe it is a negative development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 69
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 61
- In some cities, people are choosing cars instead of bicycles, whiles in other cities. Riding bikes are replacing cars. Why is this the case? Which development do you think is better? 73
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles whiles in other cities Riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, except for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77486910995 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46947317135 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.20630487 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175700411409 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674386164185 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689054840598 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113208914563 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447161367226 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.