The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The Table shows the changes in walking, Bicycle, Car, Local bus, Long distance bus, Train, Taxi and others in England over the 15 years of period.
Overall, Car was the highest average distance miles travelled per person per year in both 1985 and 2000. It follows by other which was the second highest average distance in miles. While other mode of travel was consistently increasing and decreasing each year.
Firstly, In 1985, Car was the highest average distance in miles per year for 3, 199 miles per person. It followed by other which was 450 miles average distance and local bus with 429 miles average distance. Next to that was train and walking of 289 and 255 miles. The least mode of travel used by person in 1985 was bicycle, long distance bus and taxi.
In 2000, car also had the highest miles of travel by a person per year with the average of 4,806 miles. It was followed by others of 585 it increased from 1985 to 2000. Next to that was the train with 306 miles average distance it increases for the past 15 years, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | rubingocnguyen1991 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Lincoln | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | Azizat Gilmeyeva | 61 | view |
| 2018-08-16 | VuXuan | 64 | view |
| 2016-01-04 | Michael56 | 60 | view |
- The graphs give information about computer ownership as a [percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010. 67
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 11
- Many people now have the freedom to work and live anywhere because of advances in communication technology and transportation.Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63829787234 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19381203087 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452127659574 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6733975607 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.2727272727 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800562262146 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441047138606 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375329294031 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064215654767 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119800606231 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.