The table shows the consumption of several kinds of life necessities by percentage in 5 different nation in the year of 2002.
Overall, the most money spending part of this table is the food/drinks/tobacco part in every country while the leisure and education are the least. Clothing and footwear is the category which consume as median.
In the first category, Turkey was the most food,drinks and tobacco consuming country with 32.14% while Ireland was just 28.91% as the second. Italy, Spain and Sweden were close to each other in this segment by respectively 16.36%, 18.80% and 15.77%.
In the second category, 9.00% of people were spent money on clothing and footwear in Italy. Spain’s percentage of consumer salary was 6.51% and it outraced Turkey (6.63%). 6.43% and 5.40% citizens bought clothing and footwear in Ireland and Sweden in 2002. In the third category, Turkey made up 4.35% in order to education and leisure while the Italy and Sweden was nearly close that. (3.20 and 3.22%). The least money were spent in Ireland and Spain in 2002.
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life Which do you consider to be the major influence Give reasons for your answer and include 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagrams below show The life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant Write at least 150 words 100
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
...ecessities by percentage in 5 different nation in the year of 2002. Overall, the m...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , drinks
...first category, Turkey was the most food,drinks and tobacco consuming country with 32.1...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd tobacco consuming country with 32.14% while Ireland was just 28.91% as the sec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01704545455 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.563192811 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5827435413 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2727272727 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134687521487 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488683373387 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517109869349 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970858753686 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559916922229 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.