The table below gives information about the percentage of workong force employed in six industries in Australia between 1989 and 2009 Summarize the information by secleting and reporting the main features and makr comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the percentage of workong force employed in six industries in Australia between 1989 and 2009. Summarize the information by secleting and reporting the main features and makr comparison where relevant.

The given table illustrate that the proportion of the workers in six industries in Australia during 1989 to. 2009. It can be seen that Manufacturing industry holds maximum percentage of that workers however, the tourism had least proportion of workforce.

It is Crystal clear that in only two industries the workforce decreased that were Manufacturing and Retail but the noticeable point is that there were comparatively more decrease in percentage of workers in Manufacturing industry (15-9.8) than Retail industry (11.8-10.1) during 1989 to 2009.

Next, A slight increase can be seen in other Industries that were healthcare, construction, Education and Tourism. There is a remarkable point that the proportion of employees in tourism industry became equal to education's workforce by 2009.

To conclude, In most of the industries number of employees increased slightly however, in two industries namely Manufacturing and Retail the proportion of workforce decreased.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (7 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-06-20 Jaspreet555 64 view
Essays by user Jaspreet555 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the least'.
Suggestion: had the least
...ge of that workers however, the tourism had least proportion of workforce. It is Cryst...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased that were Manufacturing and Retail but the noticeable point is that there w...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67123287671 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1853070923 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2755971469 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138071727287 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778987482566 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484501797804 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090789983828 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431063234414 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.