The table compares and contrasts data on the differences in the underground train lines systems separated by three criteria namely opening date, how long the route is, and the annual number of passengers in six distinct regions.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that European railways were operated early from the 1850s with the longest traveling distance compared to the others.
In detail, it is illustrated that European train lines systems welcomed roughly 780 and 1200 million passengers yearly in London and Paris respectively. Despite the fact of late open in 1927, Tokyo railway transport showed a wide range of passengers with 1927 million ones each year with the third longest distance of 155 km. Another Japanese train lines systems in Kyoto, however, opened 74 years later compared to that of in Tokyo, carried only 45 million people with the least distance of 11 km. Despite being built late in 2001, the number of passengers Los Angeles railways enabled to transport only 50 million ones which was about one-thirds of that of in Washington DC.
- The charts show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 74
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 78
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 78
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one-thirds of that of in Washington DC.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08426966292 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50489358199 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623595505618 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.7796598424 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 150.833333333 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124981528515 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605961337375 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413742815135 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863402393112 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463755245995 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.