The dynamic table provides data on usage of 6 various means of transportation in Shanghai in 1996, as well gives anticipation for their percentages in 2020.
Overall, most of the transport modes are predicted to fall sharply after 24 years, whereas bus and train are likely to have a positive development.
In details, it can be seen that bus - the most common mode of transportation with 39% of passenger kilometers, is predicted to dramatically decline by 15% in the future. A similar pattern is observed in scooter, which is the third most used, as there will possibly be a drop to 7%. Likewise, the two non-mobilized modes of transport will bottom out at 3% despite the persistent travel distance percentage of bicycle (27%) and on foot (7%).
On the contrary, there will likely be an increase in usage of car, which is expected to be more tripled than it was in the past (with 52%), making it the most contributing mode of transport in the future. Furthermore, train will be utilized for 13% of passenger kilometers in 2020, despite the fact that it was not operated before.
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 78
- some people think that Genetically modified GM crops are a positive development Others however argue that they are potentially dangerous Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- 2 Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, likewise, third, well, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80748663102 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93371679027 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598930481283 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6139568379 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.428571429 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136675696118 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679897672861 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06510482765 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971018296902 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739629482504 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.