The supplied table depicts percentage of spendings for different goods in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
According to the data, people in Turkey and Ireland spent the most money for food/drink/tobacco than any other country, 32.14 per cent and 28.91 per cent respectively. When Swedish spends for grocery and tobacco was the lowest (15.77 per cent). Italy with 9 per cent of spends for clothes and shoes leaded in compared countries, when average spending in all named countries was slightly above or under six per cent in overall. As in spends for groceries and tobacco, population in Sweden spend the lest, just 5,4 per cent. Getting back to the details, as Spanish haven not been domination low or high in any category, their spends for leisure and education were the lowest with only 1.98 per cent, followed by Ireland with 2.21 per cent. Almost one time more Turkish spent for pleasure activities and education than Ireland (4.35 per cent).
To sum up, people in Turkey had dominated in 2 of 3 categories, exceeding almost one time more than average.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged. To what extend do you agree? 67
- University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries 95
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9010989011 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54772108827 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7704872161 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0945426027554 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563312341626 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711023213745 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927773640612 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958764488336 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.