The diagram illustrates the proportion of client expenditure on various goods over five countries in 2002.
It can be clearly seen that residents in these five countries also tended to spend much more on food, drinks, and tobacco than other items. Overall, the expenditure on leisure and education had the lowest proportion of spending.
Food, drinks, and tobacco were the largest spending sections over five countries. 32.14% of Turkey went on these items, followed by Ireland with 28.91%. Compared with the above nations, the expenditures of these items in Italy, Spain, and Sweden had a much lower proportion, but accounted for over 15%, from 15.77% in Sweden to 18.80% in Spain.
The proportions were significantly less on other categories. As for clothing and footwear, only 9% was marked in Italy, where livers spent most these items already and lower than food, drinks, and tobacco by 7.36%. Likewise, Sweden showed the lowest proportion at 5.40% while other countries were consumed consistently equally in the proportion of expenditure. The amount of leisure and education was the least, ranging from 1.98% in Spain to 4.35% in Turkey.
- Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australia men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24456521739 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65350443283 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9561009109 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114468909323 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459354102416 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487233887878 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837629948454 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341762974973 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.