The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996, 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia
A glance at the table chart demonstrates data on visitor statistics in distinct years, specific for 1996, 1998 and 2000 in 6 selected places, namely Great Barrier Reef, Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve, Blue Mountains, Tasmania Wilderness, Shark Bay, Macquarie Island.
As an overall trend, it is immediately that the number of visitors in 2000 is by far the most, among the other distinct years. Likewise, the figure for Great Barrier Reef general was higher than other sites. However, the lowest visitor was in Macquarie Island in the 5 places.
Looking at the details, in terms of the number of visitor statistics in 2000, the Great Barrier Reef was the most visited with 3.200.000 visitors. The visitor of Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve was also high 770.000 persons as opposed to Macquarie Island which had at least 330 people. The number of Blue Mountains than the figure for Tasmania Wilderness, roughly 581.000 visitors and merely under 483.000 people, followed by a substantial fall in Shark Bay.
In 1998, as regards the quantity of visitors in Great Barrier Reef ranked first with 2.950.000 visitors, then the number of people visited in Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve was high with roughly 79.000, whereas the figure for Blue Mountains was low at 565.000, followed by a slight decline to 450.000 persons in Tasmania Wilderness. After having decreased to 102.000 visitors in Shark Bay, it plunged to 310 people in Macquarie Island.
The lowest visitor rate general was at the end of the period. The rate of Great Barrier Reef location was highest in 6 categories. Despite plummeting by 860.000 people to visit Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve place., it plunged to 526.000 visitors in Blue Mountains location. Apart from declined gradually to 450.000 people in Tasmania Wilderness, it decreased steadily to 84.000 persons in Shark Bay. Likewise, the figure for Macquarie plunges negligibly to 350 visitors
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | Bennhehe | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-03 | lnthuyvan | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-02 | Johndavisvu | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 100
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- In some countries the difference is age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, likewise, look, so, then, whereas, apart from, as regards, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 965.302439024 169% => OK
No of words: 309.0 196.424390244 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28802588997 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59492040779 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472491909385 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.1684150784 43.030603864 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146075381191 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655455514595 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537646065031 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112828545716 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492812420471 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.