The given tibial data illustrate the information about the rush of travellers at UK airport over the half a decade.
Overall, heathrow airport hide the fluctuation in the data of passengers. On the other hand, in Gatwick and stansted airport number of travellers very increased in the particular period. Another interesting point is that gatwitck was most popular at the end.
Looking at the details, number of people at Heathrow airport was 27.2 million in the beginning year. For next couple of years crowd was increased, even in mm the number was at it's peak. In 2001 and '2 there was a sudden decrease in the number of passengers and went to 33.2 million. At the last year, slight growth was reported at 45.6 million.
While, Gatwick airport begin at 36.5 million in '98. For the next three years, it rose statically at 47.3 million. In 2003, Gatwick reached at the peak of 69.3 million population. Another Standard air station was the least popular among three airports. In the three years of beginning it could successfully attract respectively 17.3, 26.6 and 39.9 million people. It remained stable at 43.3 million over the last three years.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in UK who use the internet everyday from 2003 2006 78
- a There is an increasing amount of advertising directed at children which encourages them to buy goods such as toys and snacks Many parents are worried that these advertisements put too much pressure on children while some advertisers claim that they prov 67
- the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72820512821 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52693055717 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 195.0 22.4926829268 867% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 922.0 112.824112599 817% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 195.0 22.9334400587 850% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 30.0 5.23603664747 573% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113967492415 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113967492415 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897365859846 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275401785668 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 98.3 13.2329268293 743% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -109.53 61.2550243902 -179% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 77.0 10.3012195122 747% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.34 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.06 8.06136585366 199% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.0 10.9970731707 727% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 11.0658536585 488% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.