The table compares three main airports in the UK in terms of the number of customers who use airline services from 1998 to 2003.
Overall, the quantity of people choosing plane was the main transport for moving had a tendency to increase over a period of 6 years. Meanwhile, Gatwick gained more preference of visitors for the purpose of traveling compared to other airports.
In the first 3 years from 1998 to 2000, there was a significant growth in the number of airport visitors. Heathrow airport attracted 27.2 million travelers in 1998 and this figure rose sharply, reaching a peak at 48.2 units at the end of the period. The figure for Gatwick airport was 36.5 and 44.4 million traveler, respectively. Off the 3 examined subjects, the airport called Stansted experienced the most impressive growth rate, from 17.3 billion visitors in 1998 to nearly 2.5 times as much as the number recorded in 2 years later.
Between 2001 and 2003, the upward trend in the number of airport travelers was only true for Gatwick. It witnessed the continuous increase in the visitor database, from 47.3 million travelers in 2001 to 51.1 units and ultimately reaching a peak at 69.3 units in the last year. As for Heathrow airport, the figure fluctuated with a relative decline in 2001-2002 period before rising at 45.6 units in 2003. In contrast, in 3 shown years, the number of people using Stansted's airline services remained intact, at the threshold of 43.3 million travelers per year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 42, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to plane'
Suggestion: to plane
...verall, the quantity of people choosing plane was the main transport for moving had a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase over a period of 6 years. Meanwhile, Gatwick gained more preference of visito...
^^
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f traveling compared to other airports. In the first 3 years from 1998 to 2000, ...
^^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Heathrow airport, the figure fluctuated with a relative decline in 2001-2002 per...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.908 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57653721106 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7866421842 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.545454545 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188311628393 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835443413705 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690353499242 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136216494864 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794887305438 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.