The table below presents information about the Australia economy in the late 1980s

Essay topics:

The table below presents information about the Australia economy in the late 1980s.

The table shows Australia company profits before tax for the period 1986_90 in four sector manufacturing, mining,trade and other

The most important sector was manufacturing ,where profits nearby doubled from 1986 to 1989 to peak as $8.6 billion, followed by mining, where profits reached almost $5 billion in 1989_90 ,after fluctuating just below $4 billion for the previous three years.

Profits in retail trade also grew strongly during the year period ,doubling to just below $1.4 billion .in other industries three was stready growth in profits for three from $1.2 billion to almost $1.7 billion; followed by a crash to below $0.4 billion in 1989 to 1990
Over all , after consistent rises from 1986 to 1989,profits in retail trade levelled off in 1989 to 1990,while those in manufacturing and other industries both fell. In other industries the fall was particularly sudden to less than a quarter of their 1989 level .only mining ,where profits had been stready during 1986 to 1989 showed a significant rise in profits in 1989 to
1990

Votes
Average: 4.4 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-26 Mani mahendru 44 view
2018-07-21 Manu12 75 view
Essays by user Mani mahendru :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , trade
..._90 in four sector manufacturing, mining,trade and other The most important sector...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or manufacturing, mining,trade and other The most important sector was manufactur...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... most important sector was manufacturing ,where profits nearby doubled from 1986 t...
^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by mining, where profits reached almost billion in 1989_90 ,after fluctuating ju...
^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... mining, where profits reached almost billion in 1989_90 ,after fluctuating just belo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...fits reached almost billion in 1989_90 ,after fluctuating just below billion fo...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 1989_90 ,after fluctuating just below billion for the previous three years. ...
^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lso grew strongly during the year period ,doubling to just below .4 billion .in o...
^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the year period ,doubling to just below .4 billion .in other industries three wa...
^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...riod ,doubling to just below .4 billion .in other industries three was stready gr...
^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stready growth in profits for three from .2 billion to almost .7 billion; follow...
^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th in profits for three from .2 billion to almost .7 billion; followed by a cras...
^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....7 billion; followed by a crash to below sh.4 billion in 1989 to 1990 Over all ,...
^^
Line 6, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... sh.4 billion in 1989 to 1990 Over all , after consistent rises from 1986 to 198...
^^
Line 6, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... less than a quarter of their 1989 level .only mining ,where profits had been stre...
^^
Line 6, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...quarter of their 1989 level .only mining ,where profits had been stready during 19...
^^
Line 6, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a significant rise in profits in 1989 to 1990
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12426035503 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66558224779 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573964497041 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 56.0 22.4926829268 249% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.5283676515 43.030603864 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 288.666666667 112.824112599 256% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 56.3333333333 22.9334400587 246% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 1.69756097561 1001% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0468903234803 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334659888811 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264231128248 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0411964498604 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032799206086 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.9 13.2329268293 234% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 31.56 61.2550243902 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.3012195122 221% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.4 10.9970731707 222% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 31.0 11.0658536585 280% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.