The table below show the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two period.Summari

The table chart compares visitor number to ashdown museum before and after renovation, meanwhile the pie charts present results of surveys regarding the satisfaction level of visitors to the museum in the same time period.

First looking at the table chart, the number of visitors increase from 74000 to 92000 after the redevelopment of the museum, depicting a race of 18000.
Now turning to the Pie Charts, the higher proportion of respondents dissatisfied before the refurbishment of the Museum (40%) after renovation the figures fell down by 25%. 30% of visitors expressed satisfaction at their present before the Museum was upgraded following upgradation, this group category formed,
It comprised thr largest chunk(40%).

Moreover, the percentage of people who were extremely unhappy with their visit
Halved after the Museum was developed ( 10% and 5% ). The proportion of individuals who were very pleased with their visit increased 15 to 25 after renovation. Finally a negligible number of people did not give their opinion in the survey in given time period which totalled 5%

Overall, it is clear that the number of visitors as well as their satisfaction level increased after the Museum was renovated.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were extremely unhappy with their visit Halved after the Museum was developed 1...
^^^^
Line 8, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Halved after the Museum was developed 10% and 5% . The proportion of individua...
^^
Line 8, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ter the Museum was developed 10% and 5% . The proportion of individuals who were ...
^^
Line 8, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...it increased 15 to 25 after renovation. Finally a negligible number of people did not g...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, moreover, regarding, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33854166667 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82004308903 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6378825816 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.428571429 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346835887999 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165249222694 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816273885858 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160315372885 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943037019571 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.