The tables represent in comparison the estimated number and the real number of immigrants from 1984 and 2000. According to the data given by the table, it can be easily noticed that there is an inconsistency between predicted and actual immigration figures.
One thing to point out is that the actual number of immigrants fluctuated more than the predicted one. There is an upward trend for the estimated number from 1984 until 1990, the same for reality, but in 1996 hit its peak. Then, after three years, the number of immigrants overall fell down steadily. In the last year, the trends of both numbers are similar except from 1995 which the real figure reaches a peak of 114 thousand people, with 26 more than the estimated one.
Another thing to note is that the two figures do not have the same number for each year except 1989. The two years periods of underestimation is alternated by ones of overestimation. For example, in the first two years, the actual number is higher than the predicted one, and after two years, it is reversed.
In conclusion, the number of immigrants in 1984 has tripled in 2000, and it is keen on growing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, then, another thing, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57246963053 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6557408145 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211954277906 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934092776336 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414917896369 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141318039096 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197084598125 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.