The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the score of IELTS examination of four countries named: Germany, France, Vietnam and Malaysia.
Overall, it can be seen from the table, the most significant feature is that: germany had the highest score, the opposite was true for Vietnam’s score among the three countries. In general, reading which is a part has the lowest score in most countries, excepting Malaysia. By contrast, speaking is a part which gain a advantage with highest score.
The highest overall score belonged germany students, at 6.7, followed by France, at 6.5. Moreover, Germany and France candidates also got a best score in writing skills with the average band score of 6.6 and 6.5 respectively. However, Reading skills of germany students were lower than Malyasia.
On the other hand, Viet Nam students had the lowest overall score in four countries wheras average band score of malaysia just higher than vietnam only 0.1, at 6.3, 6.4 in turn. If we compare both contries vienam and malaysia, candidates in vietnam achieved score in listening and writing skill higher than Malaysia. By contrast, reading is highest score of malaysia students in germany, vietnam and france. In addition, those also get a high score in speaking just behind germany.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-04-17 concatrencay 73 view
2021-04-17 concatrencay 73 view
2019-06-28 phuong cao 89 view
2018-06-06 minhchau2205 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table illustrates the score of IELTS...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Germany, France, Vietnam and Malaysia. Overall, it can be seen from the table, ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...contrast, speaking is a part which gain a advantage with highest score. The...
^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...eaking is a part which gain a advantage with highest score. The highest overall score ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h gain a advantage with highest score. The highest overall score belonged germa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... Germany and France candidates also got a best score in writing skills with the ...
^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... France candidates also got a best score in writing skills with the average band ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any students were lower than Malyasia. On the other hand, Viet Nam students had...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the highest'.
Suggestion: is the highest
...her than Malaysia. By contrast, reading is highest score of malaysia students in germany, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... score in speaking just behind germany.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17733990148 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56361230194 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5946702674 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147446092806 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661954466682 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318870362266 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977350260002 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0078898123462 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.