The table illustrates the band scores on average from diverse countries, namely Germany, France, Indonesia and Malaysia taking the IELTS General Test in 2010. Overall it is immediately apparent that German students demonstrated the largest result, while remaining three countries were fairly close to each other.
According to the table, it can be clearly observed that Germans displayed the highest outcome compared to other nationalities, showing their awareness in listening section by reaching 6.8. Whilst reminders' results were almost the alike, which were 6.3 out of 9. Despite the fact that the same trend remained almost steady in the following part, where occured a reading, Malays showed the highest band score in that area being the most readable by exceeding Germans.
However, Deutchland's test-takers retain their leading in writing. Subsequently, their talent, as well as an ability provide them to plateau at 6.6, whereas, in stark contrast to them, Malaysia's hit a low of merely 6.0. Surprisingly, their speaking skills weren't as low as the previous sections. Germany, again, the highest. But French, Indonesian and Malay figures were comparable for this case as well (approximately 6.3).
In conclusion, as it is obvios German was the highest not merely by total, but also by sections. At the same time, relactunts indicated an alike outcome in overall.
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 84
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000 79
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000. 84
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS General Test in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
....0. Surprisingly, their speaking skills werent as low as the previous sections. German...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40930232558 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74084937075 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.702325581395 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3638140664 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.222222222 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135494746357 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541053633078 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901066435505 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782632626779 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085499103088 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.06136585366 136% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 40.7170731707 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.