The given table illustrates the proportion of households with different consumer durables in Britain in the period between 1972and 1983.
Overall, the most consumer durable owned by British people in all the given period is television, while other goods raised such as telephone and washing machines.
In 1972, the most consumer durable owned in Britain is television and vacuum cleaner (93% and 87% respectively), and they remain at the top over the years, refrigerator and washing machine was also familiar in Britain's houses (from 73% and 66% in 1972 to 94% and 80% in 1983 respectively).
Almost half the population owned a telephone in 1972 and 1974 before it raised to 77% in 1983. Central heating also grew from 37% in 1972 to 64% in 1983.
The dishwasher was not known until 1978, where only 3% of the houses possessed it, and it increased to 5% in 1983, videos too were unknown until 1983, where 18% of the houses owned it.
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 79
- The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one. The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and further education will be something that continues throughout life. 61
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your ans 61
- The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 89
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Britain is television and vacuum cleaner 93% and 87% respectively, and they remai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89440993789 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54714431039 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4860139766 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229102298669 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114719955993 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417244672009 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123221587031 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470809359236 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.