The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.
Write a report for a university describing the information shown below.
The following table illustrates what percentage of Britain households owned 8 distinct consumer durables between 1972 to 1983.
As can be clearly observed from the table, the consumer durables which were held by Britain families can be divided into two groups based on the increase rates. The first group consists of television and vacuum cleaner which their increase rates were not high. Television climbed slightly from 93% of 1972 to 98% in 1983, while the rise of vacuum cleaner was about 8% at the same course.
The second group includes central heating, refrigerator, washing machine, and telephone, which far more remarkable increase was observable among this group. The percentage of central heating became virtually double from 37% in 1972 to 64% in 1983. Telephone followed the same patten as well (42% on 1972 to 77% of 1983). Turning to refrigerator and washing machine, although the former went up dramatically from 73% to 94% between 1972 and 1983, there was a significant rise in the latter which rose from 66% to 80% at the same period.
Overall, it is clear from the table that video and dishwasher were not surveyed at full course. The share of video was 18% in 1983, whereas dishwasher climbed slightly from 3% to 5% during 1978 till 1983. Meanwhile, all consumer durables experienced some kind of rise between 1972 and 1983.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, well, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99111111111 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55565217209 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0359342723 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.090909091 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223243639771 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961831404611 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644244403648 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159995896657 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551601708088 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.