The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.

The bar chart compares how many British, Australian, New Zealander, American and Canadian were in jail from 1930 to 1980. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that The USA have almost the most prisoner. In addition, while Canadian in prison was roughly downward trend, it is for Great Britain had been upward during the half century.

Looking at details, the number of imprisoners in Great Britain experienced a gradual rise in the half-century, with increasing just under 30,000 to around 85000 respectively. The number of the other two countries of Australia and New Zealand changed as the similar rate with a maximum in the earliest year (70,000 and 100,000) and minimum in 1950 (almost 45,000 and 50,000), all in turn.

Throughout the remaining countries, there was a slight growth in the populace of American prison in first ten years from 10,000 to about 130,000. Afterward, it fluctuated in another thirty years and rose significantly at end of the period to peak at more than 135,000. Finally, Canadian imprisonment almost decreased slowly from 1930 up to 50 years later, at 120,000 to 90,000.
In conclusion, although in jail population for North America and The UK had been growing the other nations were succeeded in reducing that rate.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad been upward during the half century. Looking at details, the number of impris...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, so, while, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05288461538 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68094701292 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639423076923 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1438496531 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0762031539241 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327245383545 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291448295443 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0458741823123 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152443585095 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.