The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

A glance at the table provided reveals the population in two different age groups, **per capita income**, and the proportion of those living in poverty in California, Utah, and Florida.
It is apparent that Utah has the largest proportion of people who are under 18 year old, and the percentage of people aged over 60 out of all three states. Furthermore, the figure for the percentage of the population living below poverty line in California is higher than other regions, despite having the highest average income per person.

People under the age of 18 account for over a quarter of Utah’s population, whereas the figure for California and Florida is much lower, at 17% and 16% respectively, At 23%, the proportion of senior citizens aged over 60 years in Florida is approximately threefold higher than in Utah. Meanwhile, those aged over 60 accounted for 13% in California.

The average income of people in California is $23,000, while the average for those living in Florida is $1,000 less. As for Utah, although its per capita income is only $17,000, this state witnesses the lowest poverty rate, at 9%. In contrast, the percentage of poverty **stricken** people in California and Florida is 16% and 12% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e average for those living in Florida is ,000 less. As for Utah, although its per ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, as for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08415841584 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32464352719 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9902636939 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.375 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153797915908 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824711745151 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634338115884 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114119413161 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539105837864 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.