The table below shows the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009
The table gives information about how many cars were manufactured in three different nations namely Argentina, Australia and Thailand in separated years including 2003, 2005 and 2009.
As can be seen clearly from the provided table, while the figure for Argentina and Thailand experienced an upward trend, the reverse was true for the other nation over the period shown. Additionally, the quantity of Thailand’s cars produced was highest; whereas, this figure in Argentina was lowest.
In 2003, Thailand was the largest car producer with 735,852 cars, while more than 450,000 cars were manufactured in Australia. In contrast, there were 253,088 cars produced in Argentina.
Two years later, significantly more cars were made by Argentina and Thailand but Australia saw a considerable decline in its figure.
In the final year, after rising, the number of cars produced in Argentina increased considerably from 352,759 to 466,089, while there were a substantial fall to 245,624 and 999,963 products in Australia and Thailand, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-23 | myduyen282 | view | |
| 2022-09-23 | myduyen282 | view | |
| 2020-02-15 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-18 | HaiTrieuIELTS | 95 | view |
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The table below shows the number of cars made in Argentina Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009 95
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better 78
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5875 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93257565972 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63125 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9308802788 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379271915556 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177342386328 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619551215899 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211986552412 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456293099934 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.