The given table summarizes the number of cars produced in Argentina, Australia and Thailand in 2003, 2006, 2009.
In 2003, amongst the three countries, Argentina had the least number of cars manufactured and the number stood at 235,088, but in 2006 and 2009, Argentina witnessed an increase in the cars manufactured. It reached a peak of 466,089 in 2009. On the other hand, in Australia the car production decreased, starting at 452,163 in 2003 and hit a rock bottom of 245,624 in 2009, which is almost a difference of 200,000 cars. In 2006, Argentina and Australia approximately made 350,000 cars each.
Finally, Thailand began with production of 735,852 cars in 2003, which is greater than the combined total of cars made by Argentina and Australia in the same year. In Thailand, a significant jump of around 380,000 cars produced was witnessed in 2006 and this production value dropped by almost 115,000 to 999,963 in 2009.
Therefore, we can conclude that Thailand is the country with the most number of cars manufactured. From 2003 to 2009, car production saw a drop in Australia, whereas, Argentina increased its car manufactured count during the same period.
- As countries become more developed many fast food outlets move into the country giving local people greater access to fast food Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 79
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats to our environment What causes global warming What solutions are there for this problem 96
- Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences Discuss both sides of this argument and then give your own opinion 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, therefore, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08808290155 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83836637165 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3802822492 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240853805109 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121129985949 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569671109172 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179862614487 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455047042227 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.