The given table compares car production in Argentina, Australia and Thailand in the years 2003,2006 and 2009.
Overall, it can be seen that the figures for car production experienced an upward trend across the board, except for Australia. In addition, Thailand was by far the most productive country in making cars.
In 2003, the figure for car production in Argentina was 235,000, which was two times lower than that of Australia, at ( 452,000). Meanwhile, Thailand’s car production was the highest this year with 736,000. From 2003 to 2006, there was a gradual increase to 352,00 cars in Argentina whereas Australia experienced a slight decrease to 341,000 cars. The figure for cars manufactured in Thailand also reached a peak at 341,000.
By 2009, the number of cars produced in Argentina was 466,00, which was nearly double the corresponding data in Australia ( 245,000). In addition, the figure for automobile production in Thailand ended the period in 1st place with approximately 1,000,000 cars, despite a minimal drop by the end.
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some educational systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 78
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 89
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o times lower than that of Australia, at 452,000. Meanwhile, Thailand’s car produ...
^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uble the corresponding data in Australia 245,000. In addition, the figure for aut...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21556886228 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85855243552 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592814371257 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2895295833 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112261643613 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644815362733 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522046606205 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956528228108 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554316388502 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.