Many people argue that the expenditure on research for a new planet such as Mars to live on should be increased as it is more and more challenging for humans to sustain life on Earth. Although this idea is reasonable for some reason, I hold a belief that other measures such as allocating money to tackle environmental problems are more practical.
On the one hand, it’s undeniable that Earth has become an unsuitable place to live. One of the most serious problems is the depletion of natural resources on Earth. With the rapid increase in populations and human exploitation, resources are on the verge of running out. For example, according to the survey conducted by Forbes in 2021, the world has lost one-third of its forest due to deforestation which humans are the main culprit. With the explosion of population, the demand for food grows sharply so that more and more forests are cut off for agricultural purposes to fulfil all the needs. Also, the illegal logging phenomenon also increases which is the main reason cause forest degradation.
However, I believe that investing more funds in exploring other planets to live in is impractical as it is really hard for humans to find a similar planet to Earth. Also, these kinds of projects cost exorbitant expensive so it’s not worth spending money on these plans. Instead of that, the government should allocate more money to preserving and promoting sustainable resources and tackling environmental problems which are the two key factors to sustaining a better life on Earth. For instance, authorities should invest funds to encourage scientists to find and develop more renewable energy such as solar energy, and hydropower,.. which are not only sustainable but also environmentally friendly. Moreover, governments should also ban strict punishment on those who commit illegal exploitation to decrease the rate of environmental deterioration and find ways to decrease pollution in the city.
In conclusion, while some advocate prioritizing planet research, I believe that there are some appropriate measures regarding spending money on environmental projects and prohibiting illegal exploitation actions to mitigate the problem. Hopefully, with these measures, Earth will become a more desirable place to live.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ronmental problems are more practical. On the one hand, it’s undeniable that Ea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... main reason cause forest degradation. However, I believe that investing more f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...rgy such as solar energy, and hydropower,.. which are not only sustainable but als...
^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...gy such as solar energy, and hydropower,.. which are not only sustainable but also...
^^
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...such as solar energy, and hydropower,.. which are not only sustainable but also envir...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ays to decrease pollution in the city. In conclusion, while some advocate prior...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, really, regarding, so, third, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32686980609 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0004795467 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540166204986 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7713932742 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.1875 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299064499669 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965303509726 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102736520828 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209766330944 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979700768421 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.