The table demonstrates the number of tourists who visited the Ashdown museum before and after the reconstruction a year. The pie charts indicate the percentage of satisfaction that customers assessed in the 2 timelines. Overall, it is clear that the number of visitors was more significant than it was after the refurbishment, and more people felt the museum was more well-worth visiting after it was upgraded.
Having looked at the table for more details, it is clear that the number of tourists was around 74000 people before the construction. After a year, there was a remarkable increase of 18000 tourists.
Focusing on the rest data given, it is apparent that during the year before being upgraded, most visitors were dissatisfied with the service, accounting for precisely 40 percent. However, its number dropped tremendously to just 15 percent after a year. The proportion of customers satisfied with the provided service was nearly a third before the reconstruction which doubled the figure for very satisfied tourists. After the improvement, their figures were 40 and 35 percent respectively. The percentage of very dissatisfied visitors was 10 percent before the refurbishment and dropped by 5 percent after a year. Notably, The shares of customers who had no comment on service quality remained stable at 5 percent during the surveyed period.
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007 78
- The Chart below shows the value of one country s export in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- A number of tertiary courses require students to undertake a period of unpaid work at an institution or organisation as part of their programme What are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of course requirement 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 77
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2962962963 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01192189895 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7351859196 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362750393304 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136341378979 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660626655613 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230717348434 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557477499432 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.