The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summari

Essay topics:

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

The data depicts the total amount of Ashdown Museum's tourists before and after the year of being rennovated. Whereas the given pie chart provide information about the level of contentment of several guests during their visit within the two same years.

Overall, it is evident that the upgrading attracted more people to the musem as well as recieving more positive comments from them. Moreover, the year before the improvement occured, the museum itself seemed to not have a good reputation according to the visitors with the negative exceeded the positive comments.

Upon closer analysis, ever since the refurbishment took place, a rough number of 92000 people visited the museum is recorded compared to the year before with 74000 visitors in total. Additionally, a staggering figure of 40% guests appeared to be dissatisfied with their visit which held twice the amount of positive ones. In contrast, 40% comments were seen as optimistic and more extreme satisfactions were recorded among guests during the year after rennovation as the displeased rates were left with solely 15%. Another notable feature is that both periods witnessed an identical pattern between the proportion of people who have no response which occupied by 5% in the pie chart.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-25 wfc 89 view
2023-04-13 ililmaidatuz view
2023-04-13 ililmaidatuz 80 view
2023-04-13 ililmaidatuz view
2023-04-13 ililmaidatuz view
Essays by user wfc :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and after the year of being rennovated. Whereas the given pie chart provide information...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25870646766 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64703735565 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63184079602 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8062492976 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.125 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313427871844 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119471365031 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661543427988 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19689513515 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658836787922 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.