The table illustrates the information about the amount of tourists to Ashdown museum between two years of before and after upgrade. Two pie charts compare the level of satisfaction of visitors in these same years.
It is clear that the number of visitors increased significantly from 74000 at the year before refurbishment to 92000 after the development. It is also noticeable that the level of satisfaction was sharp rise thanks to the improvement.
In the year before developing, most people felt dissatisfied with 40% which was followed by satisfied feeling at 30%. There are 15% travelers were very satisfied while 10% said that they felt very dissatisfied which was doubled for the figure of no response with 5%.
After the development of Ashdown museum, the percentage of satisfied feeling was moderate rose to 40% which became the most popular feeling. Additionally, the amount of people who felt very satisfied was increased sharply to 35% while the proportion of dissatisfied feeling was decreased significantly to 15%. Finally, the number of no response and very dissatisfied were identical with 5% of all.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 56
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23333333333 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99033422303 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2755401865 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276307314707 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11578496158 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552601266929 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171244721461 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031581437873 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.