The table represents the percentage of students voting for five different aspects of a university in China from 2000 to 2010
Overall, the percentage of students voted for technical quality, print resource and electronic resources increased while the proportion of students who gave good rating for the range of modules offered decreased slightly and this figure for building and teaching facilities remained unchanged
It can be seen that the print resource had the highest percentage of students voting with 87% in 2000. This figure was about 20 to 40% higher than that of the technical quality and electronic resources. While the percentage of students voting for electronic resources nearly doubled from 45 to 89% during the period shown. It is clear from the table that there was an slight increase in rating for technical quality by 69%. Print resources witnessed a slight fluctuation and reached 91% at the end of the period. Turning to the two left aspects, the percentage of students preferring for range of modules offered declined slightly . It can be seen that the figure for the building teaching facilities stayed unchanged in the past 10 years.
- The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2050 Units are given in percentages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 67
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... is clear from the table that there was an slight increase in rating for technical...
^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nge of modules offered declined slightly . It can be seen that the figure for the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68160864608 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 146.224596608 43.030603864 340% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.857142857 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294221030382 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108565133964 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119514511748 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28382160006 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157178565261 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.