The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012

The chart illustrates the feedback form about the percentage of attitude of club member and general public about new cinema in one town in 2012.
What stands out from the chart is that the majority of club member and general public felt excellent or satisfied about facilities, information and quality. Whereas, there is still a group of people who rated the new theater at poor after experienced service.
First of all, the figures of club members above the satisfaction reach 72% higher than general public 8%. The opposite trend for excellent experience in information was belong to club members with the slight decrease in the percentage to 54%. While, the general public continued to rise from 64% to 66%. Club members and general public felt satisfied with facilities reach respectively 26% and 24% and the data of information did not change much in comparison with facilities. To the poor experience, the figure of both club members and general public bottomed out at 2% and 8% but later there were more and more people in 2 groups who felt badly about information.
With a reference to the quality, 53% of general public felt excellent eight - fifths in comparison with club members. To the people who felt satisfied or poor with service in new cinema, general public was higher than club members through the period surveyed.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rcentage of attitude of club member and general public about new cinema in one town in 2012. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...is that the majority of club member and general public felt excellent or satisfied about facil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... the satisfaction reach 72% higher than general public 8%. The opposite trend for excellent ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...excellent experience in information was belong to club members with the slight decreas...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ight decrease in the percentage to 54%. While, the general public continued to rise f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...se in the percentage to 54%. While, the general public continued to rise from 64% to 66%. Club...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... rise from 64% to 66%. Club members and general public felt satisfied with facilities reach re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ce, the figure of both club members and general public bottomed out at 2% and 8% but later the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...With a reference to the quality, 53% of general public felt excellent eight - fifths in compar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ied or poor with service in new cinema, general public was higher than club members through th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, whereas, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98214285714 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58834615198 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4836582105 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332032563562 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15416173403 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948943585348 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24719688233 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997661816677 0.0819641961636 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.