The table below shows the production of carbon dioxide in five different countries in 2006.
The table graph demonstrate the manufacturing of carbon dioxide in five various countries like Japan, China, America, India, and Russia over the time period of 2006.
Overall, what stand out from the graph is that while the popularity of America grow over the period in question and that Russia high throughout, the tonnes of carbon dioxide in India fell sharply. Japan numbering, mean while, saw as increase followed by drop.
With regard to China and Russia, the tonnes of person were roughly identical at 4 and 12 million tonnes respectively. However, where as the former total production in 2005 reach 5900 before levelling off for the remainder the period, the latter peaked at 1345 in 2006. And change in production were 11 percent and 1 percent approximately.
Turning to the an other countries , India, Japan stayed consistently popular, with carbon dioxide quantity remaining between near about 1and 9 through the period. Japan's popularity was nearly as high as India's in the first half of century manufacturing, with the number of total tonnes of carbon dioxide rising from 1275 to 1450 but 2005 to 2006 saw production number crash to 175, a table which had not changed by 2006.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: meanwhile
...in India fell sharply. Japan numbering, mean while, saw as increase followed by drop. Wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...2 million tonnes respectively. However, where as the former total production in 2005 rea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...nd 1 percent approximately. Turning to the an other countries , India, Japan stayed c...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
... percent approximately. Turning to the an other countries , India, Japan stayed consist...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'country'?
Suggestion: country
...approximately. Turning to the an other countries , India, Japan stayed consistently popu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tely. Turning to the an other countries , India, Japan stayed consistently popula...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02525252525 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61775767327 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4850188063 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249128161692 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101459613002 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916079430838 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159234732183 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955272534753 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.