The given table illustrates the amount of money in five years projection that will be using for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry, measured in American dollars. Moreover, the pie chart depicts the expenditure which is expected to spend for the first year of the project. It is easily seen that money spending on the projects in West America and Central America will decrease gradually, while much more money will be spent on the project in South-east Asia during this period.
According to the illustrated table, West Africa scheme is forecast to use about 10.5 million dollars in the first year, however, money that spend in this project is predicted to decrease in the three following years and reach 2.5 million dollars in the fourth year. Then it will increase to 3.5 million dollars in the fifth year. Similar to the project in Central America, this project is predicted to spend 20 million dollars in the first year, there will be then a substantially decrease to 5 million dollars in the third year and will be remained stable until the fifth year.
On the other hand, South-east Asia is projected to spend 30 million dollars at the beginning of given period, and will be then decreased and reached 20 million dollars in the second year. After that, the expenditure is predicted to increase to 50 millions in the fourth and fifth years.
From the pie chart, salaries is forecasted to be occupied for the most spending expenditure in the first years with 50% of all expenditure. For training and office expenses, each is predicted to use 10% of the expenditure. The percentage of expenditure for set-up costs will be true with the rest.
In conclusion, despite some fluctuation, West Africa and Central America’s projects will be spent less money during the projected period but the project in South-east Asia will be use more and more money. In addition, salaries is expected to be the highest expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 77
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 to 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- More and more city workers are deciding to live in the country and travel into work every day The result is increased traffic congestion and damage to the environment What measures do you think could be taken to encourage people not to travel such long di 78
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extend do you agree or disagree with 74
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are reasons for these behaviors What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('substantially') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...s in the first year, there will be then a substantially decrease to 5 million dollars in the third year ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 965.302439024 172% => OK
No of words: 332.0 196.424390244 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66774304497 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421686746988 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 283.868780488 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4774002296 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380575049729 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179243227758 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113310224467 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236048053447 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892422097204 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.