The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned table illustrates the percentage of six types of families in Australia who were living in poverty in 1999.They were single aged person, aged couple, single with no children, couple with no children, sole parent and couple with children.
Overall, as is represented by the table, sole parent had the highest ratio of poverty whereas aged couple had relatively low rate of poverty in Australia during 1999.
It is clear from the table, sole parent and single parent with no children accounted higher percentage of poverty 21% and 19% respectively whereas aged couple were the least contributor with the proportion of 4% only. Similarly, the single aged person had contributed 6% of poverty while couple with children had figure of 12% which is the third categories of families with higher percentage.
It is evident that during 1999 in Australia the couple with no children had quite low percentage of poverty (7%).However, it can be noticed that all households contributed 11% of poverty in Australia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-08 | Sagarjango | 56 | view |
| 2018-01-08 | Sagarjango | 61 | view |
| 2016-09-22 | aldyth | 51 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with 75
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 67
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2018 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...alia who were living in poverty in 1999.They were single aged person, aged couple, s...
^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... had quite low percentage of poverty 7%.However, it can be noticed that all households ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20606060606 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73426712532 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.3973683071 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.8 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10141000193 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701656705962 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220591788585 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786057102178 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151611556342 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.