The given table illustrates the ratio of various classification of ancestory surviving in hand to mouth condition in Australia in 1999
Overall, the maximum contribution was observed of sole parent in destitution situation whereas minimum percentage was noticed of aged couple
To begin with, the percentile of single aged person in penuary was accounted as 6% while couple with children showing the double ratio .
Moreover, the percentum of aged couple was just less than one in twenty and the figure of all hosehold was witnessed as just above the one in ten .
On the other hand, the fore father those who were subsistence in destitution situation was 7% whereas couple with no children and the ratio of sole parent was just more than a fifth .
Further more, the poverty striken families with no children was accounted as just below than a fifth in 1999
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e with children showing the double ratio . Moreover, the percentum of aged coupl...
^^
Line 6, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s witnessed as just above the one in ten . On the other hand, the fore father ...
^^
Line 8, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the one in ten . On the other hand, the fore father those who were subsisten...
^^
Line 8, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f sole parent was just more than a fifth . Further more, the poverty striken fam...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 725.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03472222222 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69374011881 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.665601975 43.030603864 280% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 181.25 112.824112599 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 22.9334400587 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.75 5.23603664747 339% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0626676945234 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475291990561 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531302186369 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0427739756771 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525087114365 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 61.2550243902 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.