The given table compares about the daily prices, which were earned after selling Lunch and Dinner by a not so big restaurant between 7 to 13th October in a downtown business district. An interesting point to be noted that the sold amounts during the dinner were greater as compare to the lunch for this restaurant.
Overall analysis, it is manifest that, Friday was the highest selling day, while Sunday was the lowest. Furthermore, the selling prices fluctuated during that week. In addition, weekdays sales outstripped the weekend sale. To add on, days are represented by X axis whereas lunch and dinner are indicated by Y axis and the unit of the price is in a dollar.
This is clear from the table that, when it comes to the lunch amount, it began at 2400 dollars on Monday and peaked at 2595 dollars on Wednesday before declined sharply to 1550 dollars, which was the lowest, on Sunday. Additionally, the weekends lunch sales fluctuated from 2375 dollars to 2500 dollars, while this sale declined during weekdays, that is 1950 dollars on Saturday and 1550 on Sunday.
Stating further, regarding with the dinner sale for this time span, it started at 3623 dollars on Monday and escalated at 4350 dollars on Friday before dropped to 2450 dollars on Sunday.
- The bat chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... amounts during the dinner were greater as compare to the lunch for this restauran...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46640232568 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1356321351 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102802920094 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450103155462 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466254538774 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639661573876 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208397861862 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.