The table below shows show the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009.
The table illustrates the amount of cars manufactured in three different countries, namely Argentina, Australia and Thailand between 2003 and 2009.
Overall, Thailand has the largest number of cars produced, while the figure for Argentina was the lowest.
In 2003, the number of cars made in Thailand was the highest (nearly 785 000 cars), followed by Australia and Argentina, with more than 430 000 and approximately 146 000 cars respectively. We can also see that in 2006, Argentina surpassed Australia to be the second for the number of cars produced, at 413 062 cars.
In 2009, It is noticeable that the figure for cars made in Thailand fell down, at just more than 950 cars. However, the proportion of cars manufactured in this country always predominated among three countries through 6 years and even was quadruple the figure for the cars made in Australia. Moreover, Australia was had the lowest number of cars made, at just 212 647 cars. There was an upward trend of the number of cars made in Argentina. By contrast, Australia experienced a downward trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-23 | myduyen282 | view | |
| 2018-07-27 | Tracyphi | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | myduyen282 | view |
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 78
- In some country the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them. 73
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motobikes. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 93
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t in 2006, Argentina surpassed Australia to be the second for the number of cars ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75761569218 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5056637365 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3656897783 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176273920082 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673306168498 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249534065841 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465882235269 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.