The table gives in formation about how many cars which were produced at three countries, argentina, autralia and thailand in the period of 6 years from 2003 to 2009
It is clear that Argentina produced fewer cars than previously, but the oppposite was true for the other nations. The number of cars in thailand was the largerest in other nations; however the figure fell significant in the last two years over the period shown.
In thailland, car manufactures was 700,000 in 2003, followed by 400,000 cars produced in argentina, doubling the figure of australia. In next 2 years, cars production in thailand was on the increase to peak of 1,119 thousand, compared to a marginal climb of 200 thousand cars in autralia . in contrast, argentina generated fewer cars, with its figure declining by 200 thousand.
In the year 2009,car manufacture in thailand dropped slightly to nearly 1000 thousand. The trend was true for argentina which continued to showed a decrease in 161 thousand; however the number of cars in autralia winessed a increase to 600 thousand during this period.
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 56
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 61
- The table below shows show the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009. 78
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people.To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...l climb of 200 thousand cars in autralia . in contrast, argentina generated fewer ...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...limb of 200 thousand cars in autralia . in contrast, argentina generated fewer car...
^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d was true for argentina which continued to showed a decrease in 161 thousand; ho...
^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the number of cars in autralia winessed a increase to 600 thousand during this pe...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03910614525 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72213151776 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9466143105 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304516474652 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13488870245 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569544715908 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185667028347 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484135142878 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.